Term III done with..
Another one gone ! 3 out of 8 over!
Somehow I have a sense of deja vu. S'thing similar used to happen during engg days. Everybody would just wait for sem exams to get over & then heave a biggggg sigh of relief. Difference here being that a term is 1/4 the duration of a semester in engg college & workload is 4x times. But frankly, the end term exams just gone by made me feel very frustrated. 4 exams of 3 hrs each in 2 days. 3 days of holidays prior to the exams so that people could mug up the subjects & regurgigate in the papers. Thats what is bound to happen when there is a 'supposed' premium on grades & end terms carry upto 60-65% of weightage in some subjects. I think this kind of exam schedule screws the entire thing. Our terms are now beginning to be punctuated by mid terms & end terms rather than more meaningful activities. In hindsight, now I think what Prof Bubna did in term I with regular assessments in form of quizzes & assignments is a much better way of evaluation rather than the one we witnessed in term III. Note that I am not cribbing about this because I feel thats not my way of learning. In fact, like most engineers, I am also a last minute slogger. But thats not the idea here at MBA. I conciously try to learn something with the hope that some part of it will stick after I passout. & neither is this a vent against current stars. Good people will perform well under any evaluation method. I am talking about the learning experience of the batch at an average. Surely, slogging in your room for 3 days, cutoff from the world & praying that this ordeal get over asap doesnt help much. I think this system of evaluation is because in place because its easier for profs/TAs. More evaluation points mean more work for them. But, what the heck. The system is supposed to maximise the learning of students.
Anyways, time flies here. This term gone past was excruciating. Yes thats the word. But if there is any recurrent theme for last term (for me), its got to be leadership. Not because we had LDP. Mainly because we saw leadership from so many angles. LDP provided the theoritical inputs. Entrepreneurship cases also shed some light on it. PaEV guest speakers (who find mention in my earlier posts) also shared their leadership ideas. Vijay summarises some of the key takeaways here, here & here. Great posts all these. He has a very concise way of writing.
Looking back, Corporate Finance was bit of a disappointment for me this term. Had built up a lot of expectations from first finance core but somehow, something was missing. I do now know a coupla basic concepts but I feel my interest was never aroused enough in this. Not upto the level I was expecting. Maybe things would improve in Investments core in term IV.
The Ops & Manac courses were well designed & very aptly put in the same term. I screwed up in both of their end terms but I liked their content very much. Esp things like Toyota's famed production system, inventory management & cost accounting methods. Very tangible knowledge sets to takeaway.
One thing which deserves mention is the course design here at ISB. The core courses, course packs, content, cases, relevant articles, recommended readings are, imo, very thoughtfully done. We hardly need to refer to the so-called-bibles like Kotler or Brealey Myers. Everyone has them but class notes & cases serve the purpose much better I believe.
Anyhow, the grind continues. Yesterday, after coming out from exam (Entrepreneurship exam that too ! phew), our ELP team had a longish meeting to decide upon the project plan. The ELP also seems like another energy sapper. Expectations are pretty high & we better deliver.
Somehow I have a sense of deja vu. S'thing similar used to happen during engg days. Everybody would just wait for sem exams to get over & then heave a biggggg sigh of relief. Difference here being that a term is 1/4 the duration of a semester in engg college & workload is 4x times. But frankly, the end term exams just gone by made me feel very frustrated. 4 exams of 3 hrs each in 2 days. 3 days of holidays prior to the exams so that people could mug up the subjects & regurgigate in the papers. Thats what is bound to happen when there is a 'supposed' premium on grades & end terms carry upto 60-65% of weightage in some subjects. I think this kind of exam schedule screws the entire thing. Our terms are now beginning to be punctuated by mid terms & end terms rather than more meaningful activities. In hindsight, now I think what Prof Bubna did in term I with regular assessments in form of quizzes & assignments is a much better way of evaluation rather than the one we witnessed in term III. Note that I am not cribbing about this because I feel thats not my way of learning. In fact, like most engineers, I am also a last minute slogger. But thats not the idea here at MBA. I conciously try to learn something with the hope that some part of it will stick after I passout. & neither is this a vent against current stars. Good people will perform well under any evaluation method. I am talking about the learning experience of the batch at an average. Surely, slogging in your room for 3 days, cutoff from the world & praying that this ordeal get over asap doesnt help much. I think this system of evaluation is because in place because its easier for profs/TAs. More evaluation points mean more work for them. But, what the heck. The system is supposed to maximise the learning of students.
Anyways, time flies here. This term gone past was excruciating. Yes thats the word. But if there is any recurrent theme for last term (for me), its got to be leadership. Not because we had LDP. Mainly because we saw leadership from so many angles. LDP provided the theoritical inputs. Entrepreneurship cases also shed some light on it. PaEV guest speakers (who find mention in my earlier posts) also shared their leadership ideas. Vijay summarises some of the key takeaways here, here & here. Great posts all these. He has a very concise way of writing.
Looking back, Corporate Finance was bit of a disappointment for me this term. Had built up a lot of expectations from first finance core but somehow, something was missing. I do now know a coupla basic concepts but I feel my interest was never aroused enough in this. Not upto the level I was expecting. Maybe things would improve in Investments core in term IV.
The Ops & Manac courses were well designed & very aptly put in the same term. I screwed up in both of their end terms but I liked their content very much. Esp things like Toyota's famed production system, inventory management & cost accounting methods. Very tangible knowledge sets to takeaway.
One thing which deserves mention is the course design here at ISB. The core courses, course packs, content, cases, relevant articles, recommended readings are, imo, very thoughtfully done. We hardly need to refer to the so-called-bibles like Kotler or Brealey Myers. Everyone has them but class notes & cases serve the purpose much better I believe.
Anyhow, the grind continues. Yesterday, after coming out from exam (Entrepreneurship exam that too ! phew), our ELP team had a longish meeting to decide upon the project plan. The ELP also seems like another energy sapper. Expectations are pretty high & we better deliver.
